€16M of turnover our Client's platform generates per week 
36,360 request / per second are supported by one of our systems 
German B2C and B2B transactional portals run on the framework we are developing! Macau satellite casino closure and what it means for gaming
Macau’s Satellite Casino Closure is now complete, with Landmark Casino ceasing operations at midnight on 1 January, closing the book on a model that had been part of the city’s gaming landscape for decades. For operators, employees, and policymakers, this is not just a property level change. It is a structural reset that signals how Macau wants its casino industry to be owned, controlled, and ultimately perceived, in the next phase of growth.
The immediate story is straightforward, the last remaining satellite casino shut its doors, and there are now no operational satellite casinos in Macau. The bigger story sits behind the timing and the legal mechanics that made this moment effectively inevitable.
What exactly closed and why it matters
Landmark Casino was the final venue operating under a satellite arrangement, and its shutdown followed the expiry of a three-year transitional period set by Law 7/2022. That law amended Macau’s legal framework governing casino games of fortune and established a firm deadline for the future of satellite casinos.
Under the revised rules, satellite casinos had to either restructure their operating models or exit the market by 31 December 2025. In practice, the remaining satellite properties did not transition into a new compliant model, and instead closures rolled through the segment in stages until the deadline passed.
This outcome is significant because satellite casinos were not simply small venues. They represented a distinct way of expanding gaming capacity and geographic presence through arrangements outside the fully integrated, directly operated concessionaire model. With their disappearance, Macau’s industry is moving toward a more centralized operational structure under licensed operators.
The regulatory trigger was Law 7/2022
The closures were not abrupt from a regulatory standpoint. Law 7/2022 created a three-year transition window, which served as a runway for operators to decide whether satellite venues would be reshaped or sunset.
The stated direction embedded in the regulatory shift is clear, a paradigm move toward fully integrated casino operations directly owned and managed by licensed concessionaires. From a governance perspective, that is a cleaner model. It typically reduces gray areas around management control, accountability, and oversight of casino operations.
What is interesting is that the final decision did not frame itself as purely regulatory compliance. The three gaming concessionaires that owned the remaining satellite properties opted to terminate related operations ahead of the deadline, citing commercial considerations. This detail matters because it suggests the satellite format may have become less attractive even if alternative structures were theoretically possible.
Which concessionaires and venues were affected
The closures affected 11 venues previously operating under satellite arrangements, including long-standing properties managed by SJM Resorts, Melco Resorts and Galaxy Entertainment. These were not isolated assets, they were part of broader concessionaire portfolios, which means the decision to close likely reflected portfolio level priorities rather than just venue level performance.
Casino Grandview was the first to shut down, closing permanently as a gambling venue on 30 July 2025. The remaining properties followed in stages through the end of the year, culminating in the Landmark Casino closure at the start of 2026.
For Macau, this sequencing is important. A staged drawdown reduces operational shock, gives time for workforce arrangements, and lets authorities observe any economic or social effects as they develop rather than absorbing them all at once.
Employment and social impact has become part of the story
One of the most sensitive questions around venue closures is what happens to workers. The affected concessionaires committed to the Macao SAR Government that displaced employees would be properly settled, and the Labour Affairs Bureau stated it will closely monitor employment arrangements to ensure workers’ rights and interests are safeguarded.
Authorities also indicated they will assess wider economic or social impacts arising from the closures and take appropriate measures where necessary. This emphasis on monitoring is notable because it reinforces that gaming policy in Macau is not framed solely in terms of revenue, it is tied to stability, labour outcomes, and broader public confidence in how the sector is managed.
Why the closure happened during a strong revenue year
It would be easy to assume a sector wide contraction drove these shutdowns, but the available numbers point in the opposite direction. Gross gaming revenue for 2025 reached MOP247.40bn, around €26.3bn, a 9.1% year-on-year increase and above the government’s full-year target.
December revenue totalled MOP20.89bn, up 14.8% from the same month a year earlier, making it the strongest December performance since the Covid-19 pandemic. There was a slight month-on-month decline linked to seasonal factors, but the year-end picture remained robust.
This creates an important context for Macau’s Satellite Casino Closure. It was not a reaction to collapsing demand, it was a decision that aligned market restructuring with a period of sector strength. In many regulated industries, policymakers and dominant operators prefer to implement structural change when revenue momentum is positive, because it reduces the perception that reform is crisis-driven.
Tourism rebound added fuel to the year end surge
Tourism growth provided a salient boost to year-end results. During the nine-day holiday period from 20 to 28 December, inbound visitors totalled 1.14 million, with cross-border movements reaching 6.25 million.
By 27 December, cumulative arrivals exceeded 39.4 million, allowing Macau to surpass its pre-pandemic tourism record from 2019. That milestone matters because Macau’s casino economy is tightly coupled to visitation, and stronger tourism numbers tend to reinforce confidence in long-term investment and regulatory consolidation.
What this means for Macau gaming regulation going forward
The end of the satellite casino segment is a practical expression of the direction Macau is taking, fewer operating models, clearer responsibility lines, and a stronger expectation that concessionaires directly control the customer experience and compliance environment.
From a regulatory point of view, the trade-off is familiar. Centralization can improve oversight and make enforcement more straightforward, but it also reduces variety in operating formats that historically gave the market a broader footprint. The closure of 11 satellite venues therefore becomes a test case in whether the benefits of streamlined governance outweigh the loss of a distinctive legacy segment.
There is also a reputational angle. A framework that emphasizes direct concessionaire ownership and management is often seen as a way to reinforce integrity and accountability in gaming operations. In that sense, Macau’s shift is not just administrative, it is part of how the jurisdiction positions itself in a world where gambling markets are increasingly scrutinized for social impact and governance standards.
Operational implications for concessionaires
For SJM Resorts, Melco Resorts and Galaxy Entertainment, the closures represent a strategic simplification. Even when individual venues have loyal patrons, satellite arrangements can create complexities in brand control, operating standards, and long-term capex decisions. Consolidating operations under directly owned and managed structures can reduce those friction points.
At the same time, shutting venues is rarely frictionless. Operators must manage workforce transitions, customer migration, and the potential shift of spend patterns to other properties. That is why the commitment to properly settle displaced employees, combined with official monitoring by the Labour Affairs Bureau, is more than a formality, it is part of maintaining stability while the market reshapes.
Three takeaways readers should remember
- Law 7/2022 set the transition timeline and required satellite casinos to restructure or exit by 31 December 2025,
- 11 satellite venues were affected, with closures rolling out from Casino Grandview on 30 July 2025 to Landmark Casino on 1 January 2026,
- the closures happened alongside rising 2025 gaming revenue and a tourism rebound that surpassed the 2019 visitor record.
The end of a chapter, and a signal of Macau’s next model
Landmark Casino’s closure is symbolically powerful because it marks the first time in decades that Macau operates with no satellite casinos at all. But the more important signal is what replaces that model, a tighter alignment between regulatory intent and operational reality, with concessionaires expected to run gaming operations directly and transparently.
Macau’s 2025 performance shows the market is growing again, and tourism has regained momentum. Against that backdrop, Macau’s Satellite Casino Closure looks less like a retreat and more like a recalibration, a deliberate move to define what the industry should look like in the post-pandemic era, and how it should be governed when scrutiny is high and expectations around responsibility are rising.
With the satellite segment now closed, Macau’s casino industry enters 2026 with stronger revenue momentum, record-level tourism recovery, and a clearer, more centralized operating framework shaped by Law 7/2022.
